Electronics Forum: flux residue (Page 66 of 116)

Issues with No Clean Resdue??

Electronics Forum | Thu May 11 15:11:14 EDT 2006 | patrickbruneel

I assume you talk about wave soldering. No-clean fluxes are widely used since 1987 or earlier and after all these years they have proven to be reliable. If you clean the board or not the dust bunnies etc. will still reach the board surface. If you us

Re: no-clean vs. water soluble

Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 15 09:24:54 EDT 2000 | C.K.

At my last place of employment, that was the big reason why nobody (especially the Design Engineers) bought into a no-clean process - interference with high-impedance circuits. One guy was so paranoid about flux residues remaining on the board, that

No-clean solder paste

Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 22 14:12:09 EST 2001 | slthomas

Interesting...the very reason we use water soluble paste on some of our boards is for that reason, although I've never been able to get anyone to show me something in print that supports it. It's just what engineering has told me. We currently have

No-clean solder paste

Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 22 16:35:06 EST 2001 | Steve

Deja vu! When I read your response I turned around to see if you standing behind me listening to our problem. We currently make about 50 different boards all using no-clean that have no problems, yet this newest boards has a couple of issues that eng

No-Clean or water

Electronics Forum | Sat Jun 09 14:28:58 EDT 2001 | Kelvin

No-clean solder paste is definately a trend for tomorrow. However, there are several points you need to consider before you shift from WS to no-clean: 1. Component quality - No-clean solder paste generally (not essentially) get a lower avtivity than

Re: Dross characteristic

Electronics Forum | Sat Oct 09 03:26:58 EDT 1999 | Brian

| Always experiencing dross in pot with different characteristic such as color, shape, dry/wet etc. Any paper, wetsites provide the more comprehesive explanation on its characteristic | Dross is a mixture of various things. The obvious ones are met

problem when testing the RF product

Electronics Forum | Sat Jun 19 11:44:00 EDT 1999 | Vic Lau

Do anyone have any experience on assembling high frequency product, 1.8GHz or 2.4GHz. In our production line, we manufacture 1.8GHz product with using no clean paste (RMA type) for reflow and no clean wire for rework. In our functinal test,either at

Re: HASL - again?

Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 18 12:36:52 EDT 1999 | Brian

What is the future of HASL with lead-free solders? I have grave misgivings as, even if it works properly (which I'm not too sure about), the alloy will have to match that used in the soldering process, or nearly so. No use using a Bi-containing HASL

High Frequency Product.... malfunction when using no clean paste

Electronics Forum | Wed Jun 16 08:56:34 EDT 1999 | Vic Lau

Do anyone have any experience on assembling high frequency product, 1.8GHz or 2.4GHz. In our production line, we manufacture 1.8GHz product with using no clean paste (RMA type) for reflow and no clean wire for rework. In our functinal test,either a

Adhesion loss on passives over wave

Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 17 19:58:00 EST 1999 | Marc Ruggiero

Hi folks, I am looking for inputs on a long-standing problem encountered in our shop: Bottom-side parts (passives) falling off in the Wave...where the only remnants of the part is a flattened glue dot of proper diameter and volume, and sometimes f


flux residue searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information