Electronics Forum: stencil printing (Page 12 of 184)

uBGA (.5mm pitch) printing woes

Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 19 09:41:30 EDT 2017 | sumote

Steve, The 4 things I would do, and in this order: 1. Clean your stencil with stencil cleaner wipes after it comes out of the stencil cleaner. I like MicroCare ProClean (MCC-PROWR). I will even saturate the wipe with a bit of isopropal just till

Squeegees for Step-Down stencil

Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 27 16:11:23 EST 2002 | davef

In my haste to respond, I neglected to ask THE QUESTION. What is it about your current process that you would like to improve? While we're at it, tell us more about your: * Stencil * Paste * Printing process and set-up

Paste printing fine pitch components

Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 22 09:20:31 EDT 2013 | swag

Yes, car rims (and brass tubas)! You finally helped me get to the bottom of this expensive issue. We fired the culprit. It's the same guy that was using the ultrasonic stencil washer to clean car parts on night shift. It might be snake oil, I don

Paste printing fine pitch components

Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 15 19:27:08 EDT 2013 | swag

See if you can get a sample of Dek's Nano Protek. We use it on all our fine pitch stencils. I'd say it's kind of like car wax for the aperture walls. They operators really like it a bug me every day to order more if we run out.

uBGA (.5mm pitch) printing woes

Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 07 07:36:57 EDT 2017 | tsvetan

we use 0.12 mm stencil with 0.3 mm apretures for 0.5mm step FBGA153 memory without problems the solder paste is SAC305 Class4 http://www.olimex.com/Products/Components/Soldering/SOLDER-PASTE-SAC305-CLASS4/

uBGA (.5mm pitch) printing woes

Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 07 11:35:45 EDT 2017 | slthomas

That is a good point, and was something that we discussed yesterday in our process eng. meeting. I don't have an answer right now as to the current cleanliness but I know they were washing (U/S) the stencil repeatedly during the previous run and in

uBGA (.5mm pitch) printing woes

Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 22 14:10:19 EDT 2017 | slthomas

Just for the sake of passing along the information, the fine grained stencil provided zero improvement over the standard PhD stainless and was not nearly as helpful as the baked-on nano-coating. We probably won't be trying that again unless we go und

uBGA (.5mm pitch) printing woes

Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 19 13:09:48 EDT 2017 | slthomas

Thanks, all, for your responses. It's always helpful to know what everyone else is doing, whether to validate your own experience or to force you think in more detail. At this point we've determined that no amount of aperture design, material contr

pump print stencil

Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 06 08:57:32 EST 2007 | davef

With this small amount of background information on the situation, comments are: * If you let adhesive cure on your stencil, you should not be using Zestron 301. A hammer and chisel is more effective. * Assuming you are not letting the adhesive cure,

uBGA (.5mm pitch) printing woes

Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 08 01:08:10 EDT 2017 | tsvetan

The material is 0.12mm stainless steel, electropolished it's thick for fine pitch but we have lot of other big components on the board which do not solder good if we use 0.1mm thickness stencil. The 0.3 mm apretures are big enough and have good rele


stencil printing searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information