NEED DEPANELIZING MACHINE

Subscribe to Thread

We are building seven different assemblies that have flex ci... - Sep 15, 2004 by

Hi Sue, We have a Micromat Router & a Sony Router which w... - Sep 15, 2004 by Rob

If you need high volume check into either Cencorp or PMJ Aut... - Sep 15, 2004 by

Sue--Good morning. We deal in used and reconditioned assembl... - Sep 15, 2004 by Eamexco

Try Genitech in Taiwan.They make a motorized unit and are ve... - Sep 27, 2004 by

sue ph

#30531

NEED DEPANELIZING MACHINE | 15 September, 2004

We are building seven different assemblies that have flex circuitry that go off in four different directions within the panel. The panels are square to facilitate flow through smt & wave solder and depanilized in solder touchup. Currently, we are using a dremel, but know there must be a better way. I have looked on line for depanelizing machines, but find nothing that will go around tight corners as is needed on these seven boards. Does anyone out there have some suggestions or a way to point me? Thanks

reply »

Rob

#30532

NEED DEPANELIZING MACHINE | 15 September, 2004

Hi Sue,

We have a Micromat Router & a Sony Router which we use for Rigid & flexi rigid.

We use a press for Flex only (or where flex is joining the boards) & a scoring machine for other rigids.

Hope that helps,

Rob.

reply »

BobL

#30534

NEED DEPANELIZING MACHINE | 15 September, 2004

If you need high volume check into either Cencorp or PMJ Automec.

reply »

Eamexco

#30535

NEED DEPANELIZING MACHINE | 15 September, 2004

Sue--Good morning. We deal in used and reconditioned assembly machinery and have a Cencorp TR2100 Router (Dual board holder--shuttle style system) that needs a few parts reinstalled in our warehouse in the Chicago suburbs. There are others available. Call me at (262) 249-0808 or email direct---eamexco@sbcglobal.net. Nick Haviland. Electronic Assembly Machinery Exchange.

reply »

Mark

#30724

NEED DEPANELIZING MACHINE | 27 September, 2004

Try Genitech in Taiwan.They make a motorized unit and are very reasonable

reply »