Printed Circuit Board Assembly & PCB Design SMT Electronics Assembly Manufacturing Forum

Printed Circuit Board Assembly & PCB Design Forum

SMT electronics assembly manufacturing forum.


Aqueous Cleaning Systems

D. Brian Davis

#23297

Aqueous Cleaning Systems | 6 February, 2003

I need some feedback on aqueous cleaners. We currently use a Unit Design batch cleaner. We will be looking to upgrade our board washing process and batch sizes in the near future. I am looking for user info. on the advantages/disadvantages to using batch vs. in-line, conveyor type systems. Also, recommendations for manufacturers.

This application will be used primarily to clean PCB's manufactured with water soluable solder paste.

Any feedback would be appreciated.

Thank You for your time,

Brian Davis Man. Eng. Tech. Compex Technologies Inc.

This message was posted via the Electronics Forum @

reply »

Mike Konrad

#23300

Aqueous Cleaning Systems | 6 February, 2003

There are many differences between batch-format and inline format aqueous cleaning systems. First, please allow me two make two things clear.

1: I am a manufacturer of both batch and inline aqueous cleaning systems. Because my company manufacturers both technologies, I have no particular bias.

2: Because I am an equipment manufacturer, I shall refrain from making specific comparisons between brands in order to keep this forum free from the �sales-speak� commonly associated with us �sales-types�. I am eager however, to provide brand-specific information offline.

My advice is application specific. It applies to your water soluble application. My advice would be different if you had a no-clean or rosin based application.

There are both advantages and disadvantages with batch and inline equipment. I�ll begin with inline equipment.

Inline equipment has its advantages over batch-format cleaning systems. Advantages include:

Throughput: In most applications, an inline cleaner is capable of cleaning more boards per hour than a batch machine.

Faster Turn-Around: If you only need one or two boards cleaned at a particular time, the time from board entry to board exit is usually less than in a batch machine.

Disadvantages of an inline machine include:

Cost: Cost can be separated into two categories:

Acquisition Cost: Inline machines cost more than batch machines. In most cases, inline prices start at about two times the cost of a batch machine (an can go as high ad 8 times).

Operational Costs: This is an area frequently overlooked by buyers. The operational costs of an inline machine are considerably more than a batch machine. To begin with, an average inline machine consumes three to four times the AC current than a batch machine. An inline machine generally requires more water, more DI media tanks, and more maintenance than a batch machine. The extra costs associated with inline machines are not necessarily an issue is your board volumes are high. It all comes down to the cost per board.

Environmental Issues: Because inline machines consume more water, they will produce more waste. Discharging waste water from any cleaning system always has an associated cost. This cost can be found in discharge permits. Most municipalities require a permit for any discharge (hazardous or not). Because the discharge of any waste increases a company�s potential liability exposure, one must somehow factor a cost for liability exposure. A closed-loop cleaning system will eliminate the exposure issues as well as reduce some of the operating costs.

Other environmental issue include space and noise. An inline machine requires more footprint than a batch machine. Don�t forget, space is money. Noise is another concern. All inline cleaners generate more noise than batch machines. Determine in advance the decibel rating of the machine. Does your company have a decibel-meter equipped Health and Safety officer?

Please do not get the impression that I am opposed to inline machines. On the contrary, we make a good living selling them. Just be sure that you can justify one.

Batch machines also have pro�s and con�s.

Pro: Allow be to dispel one myth associated with batch machines. A good batch machine is capable of cleaning as good or better than an inline machine. This is a fact. Batch machines, because they are not limited by a fixed conveyor length, are capable of cleaning or drying for as long as is required to obtain clean and dry boards.

Con: Batch machines are not as fast as inline machines. Although a batch machine can clean multiple boards at one time, high throughput can only be achieved if you have high quantities of boards ready for cleaning at one time. If your production line pumps out one board every ten minutes, and you want to clean that board immediately, a batch machine will choke your assembly line. If, however, your product line pops out one board every ten minutes and you can wait until you have a decent production lot before starting the cleaner, then production will not suffer. A batch machine�s board holding capacity depends on both brand and board size. The smaller the board, the greater the capacity and likewise, throughput. If you can fit 45 boards at one time into a batch machine that takes under 20 minutes per cycle, then you can expect 135 boards per hour. That�s not bad! But, if you choose to only place two boards at one time into the machine, expect a measly 6 boards per hour.

Pro: Some batch machines are equipped with a built-in resistivity meter that monitors the quality of the water flowing off the boards. With this feature, one may pre-program a cleanliness value and instruct the machine to continue the cleaning process until the cleanliness value has been achieved.

Pro: Batch machines use very little water. On a non-closed-loop model, an average batch machine will consume and discharge about 6 � 10 gallons of water per load of boards. Considering that DI water is not free, a fluid-frugal machine saves money. If you desire a closed-loop operation, batch machines are less expensive to close-loop.

Pro: Machine noise is far less than an inline. Many machines operate at about 60 dB (a relatively low number).

My suggestion: Determine your throughput requirements. Contact multiple cleaning equipment manufacturers. Discuss closed-loop and open-loop considerations. Discuss potential board sizes to determine throughput and cost per board.

If you have specific brand-to-brand questions, please feel free to contact me offline at (800) 218-8128.

I hope this helps!

Mike Konrad konrad@aqueoustech.com

This message was posted via the Electronics Forum @

reply »

#23302

Aqueous Cleaning Systems | 6 February, 2003

Batch vs. In-Line for straight aqueous cleaning applications tends to be all about production. You'll have to see what cycle times you get from the various batch systems out there vs. the in-lines. In-Lines come in various sizes. Some of the leading mfgs. are:

Austin American Technology, batch (took over the ECD product line) & in-line systems http://www.aat-corp.com/

Cookson Electronics Equipment- Electrovert, batch & in-line systems http://www.cooksonee.com/products/electrovert/Cleaning/Aquajet/index.htm http://www.cooksonee.com/products/electrovert/Cleaning/Aquastorm/index.htm

Aqueous Technologies, batch & in-line system (Millennium in-line model looks like Technical Devices Galaxy model- not sure who's the mfg.) http://www.aqueoustech.com/

Technical Devices, in-line systems only (Nu/Clean Galaxy looks like Aqueous Tech in-line?) http://www.technicaldev.com/cleaners.html

Stoelting, in-line systems only http://www.stoelting.com/

Trek Industries, batch & in-line systems http://66-214-183-12.la-cbi.charterpipeline.net/index.html

These mfgs. can perform applications studies for you to compare models and in-line vs. batch.

reply »

#23306

Aqueous Cleaning Systems | 7 February, 2003

For all of the ranting about "sales-types" using the forum inappropriately, it's nice that some of those types get IT.

So if you rant when people behaving poorly, then you must praise people when perform well. This is over-due. Hats off to Mike, Pete, and all the others that have taken the time to tune their responses for the purpose at hand. Good job, guys and gals.

Reference J Gitomer's Rule 7.5 of selling: "Never get caught selling."

reply »

MA/NY DDave

#23320

Aqueous Cleaning Systems | 9 February, 2003

Hi

The best I can figure Mike did a good job explaining some things, and hawked his own company's expertese very very well. He really did nice and worked the weave very well. He gave his number only after lots of info, which is different from some other posters.

One other thing from long ago is that some flux systems clean better in an in line spraying system, rather than a soaking system. Kind of like how you wash dishes with a nozzle. Both soaking and spraying can be in line yet batch has a harder time with spraying on the individual assembly.

If your cleaning now is adequate then the above is of no concern and you should only use the Cost per Board as MikeK noted.

Cost per Board is calculated by including equipment amoritization via the tax laws, total yearly costs for the process and yearly volumes. Simple spread sheets can be used.

I wouldn't worry so much about how fast you can get a board out of the system. Mike makes a minor deal about it yet I think it is trivial for most producers.

YiE, MA/NY DDave

This message was posted via the Electronics Forum @

reply »

Equipment Auction - Eagle Comtronics: Low-Use Electronic Assembly & Machining Facility 2019 Europlacer iineo + Placement Machine  Test & Inspection: Agilent | Tektronix | Mantis Machine Shop: Haas VF3 | Haas SL-20 | Mult. Lathes

See Your 2024 IPC Certification Training Schedule for Eptac